Authorities held that directors violated Section 184 by not filing Form MBP-1 for FY 2023-24. A penalty of ₹1 lakh each was imposed for the disclosure ...

ROC penalized the company and directors for conducting a board meeting 79 days late, reinforcing strict compliance with ...

MCA imposed penalties for delayed board meetings, citing a 427-day gap as non-compliance. The order directs payment within 90 days and outlines appeal rights and consequences for ...

The ROC levied penalties after finding that mandatory company details were omitted from MGT-9 and financial statements. The order highlights that even inadvertent filing gaps attract liability under ...

ROC Bengaluru imposed penalties for a 403-day delay in issuing share certificates, citing violation of Section 56. The order directs payment within 90 days and outlines the appeal ...

The ROC imposed penalties after finding that CSR funds meant for ongoing projects were wrongly spent and not transferred to ...

ROC imposed significant penalties for failure to file FY 2019–20 financial statements despite extended deadlines. The case ...

ROC held that financial statements signed without prior Board approval violated Section 134(1), attracting penalties on the ...

The ROC Bengaluru imposed penalties for a 94-day delay in conducting the required board meeting, citing violation of Section ...

The ROC held that failure to attach FY 2017–18 financial statements could not be penalized due to post-default ...

The Allahabad High Court ruled that a GST penalty under section 129(3) cannot be imposed for non-filing of Part-B of an e-way bill caused by a technical glitch without intent to evade ...

The adjudicating authority held that failing to fill the company secretary vacancy for over three years violated Section 203(5). Full penalties were imposed as the company was not eligible for reduced ...