Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson expressed concern over the high court’s landmark decision in July that granted ...

The high court’s 6-3 ruling – which said that Trump had at least presumed immunity for his official acts as president and that for some “core” acts, that immunity was absolute – made clear that Smith ...

Special counsel Jack Smith is pressing forward with his 2020 election inference case against Donald Trump, with a new ...

Trump was initially indicted on the identical four counts in August 2023. Smith recently requested Judge Tanya Chutkan to slightly postpone the case, explaining that the government was still ...

Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson detailed her concern over the Court's Trump immunity ruling in 2023 ...

Trump succeeded in getting the sentencing date moved from July to September after convincing Justice Juan Merchan to assess the potential effect of the Supreme Court’s July 1 decision on presidential ...

U.S. Circuit Judge Rachel Bloomekatz, a Joe Biden appointee, joined the decision in full, but U.S. Circuit Judge John Nalbandian, a Donald Trump appointee, partially dissented and disagreed with the ...

While Trump and his allies in Congress have repeatedly pointed ... the January 6 case that was stalled following the Supreme ...

Mr. Smith’s new indictment barely trims his sails, even after he lost in July at the Supreme Court, which ruled that a President has immunity from prosecution for acts committed as part of his ...

The implications of the US Supreme Court’s ruling on president immunity in Trump v. United States are broad and troubling, a panel of constitutional law experts agreed at an NYU Law Forum on July 9.

The high court’s 6-3 ruling – which said that Trump had at least presumed immunity for his official acts as president and ...