More news
Opinion: How ironic Supreme Court’s devastating blow to democracy came so close to the Fourth, laying out the welcome mat for fascism in America.
The judge overseeing Donald Trump's classified documents case denied a motion to dismiss the charges against the former president's co-defendant and longtime aide, Walt Nauta. Nauta's lawyers attempted to have the charges against him thrown out by arguing that he was "selectively" and "vindictively" prosecuted by investigators – a claim that Judge Aileen Cannon considered during a hearing in May.
The federal judge presiding over the classified documents case against Donald Trump refused Saturday to throw out charges against a co-defendant of the former president. Lawyers for Walt Nauta, Trump's personal valet,
The Supreme Court has thoroughly vacated the premise upon which the Founding Fathers instigated revolution in the first place.
Trump wants his hush-money verdict set aside. But a legal doctrine called "harmless error" is more powerful than his immunity, experts believe.
Fox News correspondent Madison Scarpino has more as a judge delays Trump classified documents case to weigh immunity on 'Fox Report.'
L ast week, the Supreme Court handed Donald Trump a huge win when it ruled that current and former presidents could not be criminally prosecuted for acts deemed “official.” Th
In immunity ruling Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts dismissed as "extreme hypotheticals" what law enforcement might do, ignoring the FBI's history.
The House Judiciary Committee will postpone Alvin Bragg's public testimony hearing, set for Friday, due to a delay in Donald Trump's New York sentencing.
House Republicans have postponed a planned hearing with Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg (D) as former President Trump’s sentencing in the New York hush money case has also been delayed. The hearing with the House Judiciary Committee’s select subcommittee on government weaponization was expected to take place Friday,
Legal expert: SCOTUS "invented a new rule" that could even give Trump immunity for "unofficial acts"
The Supreme Court last week ruled 6-3 that presidents have "absolute immunity from criminal prosecution" for acts that fall within the "exercise of his core constitutional powers he took when in office.
"Separation of powers and judicial independence undoubtedly are principles fundamental to our Constitution, but neither was genuinely threatened by the chief justice meeting with the committee."
The justices of the Supreme Court should have paused to consider the real-world implications of “absolute immunity.”
A landmark Supreme Court decision that reins in federal agencies’ authority is expected to hold dramatic consequences for the nation’s health care system, calling into question government rules on anything from consumer protections for patients to drug safety to nursing home care.
U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon granted a partial halt in the classified documents case against Donald Trump on Saturday, a day after his legal team asked for a pause in proceedings due to the
Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) announced Monday that he and other Senate Democrats will work to advance legislation to strip former President Trump of the immunity he was granted under a recent Supreme Court ruling protecting a president’s official acts from criminal prosecution.
The Supreme Court’s stunning ruling giving presidents immunity from prosecution for official acts raises serious questions about orders issued by the commander in chief to the military, especially if those commands clearly violate U.
Following the U.S. Supreme Court ruling that grants Trump partial immunity concerning his federal 2020 election interference case, Judge Aileen Cannon paused deadlines tied to his classified documents case,
Former President Trump has argued prosecutors at his recent hush money trial introduced evidence that is protected under the Supreme Court’s presidential immunity ruling, an assertion that could upend his conviction.
The Supreme Court's decisions this term affect the presidential election, federal enforcement of environmental rules, gun control and more.
Just one month after a New York jury made him the first former president convicted of a crime, the guilty verdict in former President Trump’s hush money case is already in peril following a Supreme Court ruling on presidential immunity.
Judge Aileen Cannon denied a major dismissal motion in the Espionage Act criminal case Donald Trump faces in Florida, but she still included some barbs for prosecutor Jack Smith, a legal expert highlighted on Saturday.
This is a special edition of Keeping Up With the Trump Trials. The Supreme Court ruled that Donald Trump (and all future presidents) enjoys absolute immunity for “official” acts committed while in office.
The Supreme Court's decision on presidential immunity has been met with hyperbolic claims of death squads and tyranny, but the truth is that presidents are not immune from criminal prosecution for unofficial or private actions,
The Supreme Court found presidents have absolute immunity for exercising core constitutional powers. The team at Trump's Trials podcast broke down how the decision could affect Trump’s legal cases.
With the court essentially finding that the US president is above the law in certain cases, expect a re-elected Trump to be even more emboldened.
Republicans excelled at the long game, finally succeeding in a decades-long campaign to take full control of the Supreme Court.
President Trump’s valet, Waltine Nauta, will have to go to trial on charges following the rejection by Judge Aileen Cannon of his motion for dismissal of the charges handed up by Special Counsel Jack Smith — though a reckoning looms at the Supreme Court,
The Supreme Court ruling on presidential immunity continues to fan the flames of fear and doubt about whether America’s democracy can hold if presidential power is expanded.
Trump has argued that him taking classified documents to his Mar-a-Lago home constituted an official act — and that the Supreme Court's ruling means the charges against him should be dropped.
The U.S. Supreme Court ended its term Monday with a highly anticipated decision that provides American presidents with a modicum of immunity from criminal charges. The case was ostensibly about